First Quarter 2022 Results
All amounts expressed in US dollars
TORONTO, May 04, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Barrick Gold Corporation (NYSE:GOLD)(TSX:ABX) today announced a $0.20 per share quarterly dividend, the first to include a $0.10 per share performance component in line with its new dividend policy.
President and chief executive Mark Bristow said the Company’s net cash balance at the end of Q1 stood at $743 million, reflecting cash flow from the operations, the continuing sale of non-core assets, and its share of a further $0.6 billion in cash distributions by Kibali.
Since agreement on the repatriation of revenue from Kibali was reached with the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) last year, Kibali has delivered $1.2 billion (on a 100% basis) in the form of dividends and debt repayments, inclusive of distributions received subsequent to March 31, 2022.
Bristow said as guided earlier, Q1 was a softer quarter, particularly when compared to Q4 of 2021, which included a record-breaking performance from Nevada Gold Mines. With a stronger performance expected in the second half of the year, Barrick remains on track to meet its 2022 production guidance.
Highlights of the quarter included the framework agreement with Pakistan on restarting the Reko-Diq copper-gold project. Bristow is scheduled to meet the country’s new prime minister later this month to review progress.
Also significant was the progress made in securing a new tailings storage facility for the Pueblo Viejo project in the Dominican Republic. The project is designed to unlock approximately 9 million ounces of measured and indicated resources and convert them into additional proven and probable reserves, extending the mine’s life by more than 20 years.13
“Barrick controls what are unquestionably the mining industry’s best gold assets as well as some substantial copper mines. Reko Diq is one of the largest undeveloped copper-gold porphyry deposits in the world, and if the conditions to closing are satisfied, it will be a very significant addition to this portfolio, even before it goes into production, by boosting reserves and resources as the updated feasibility study unfolds,” Bristow said.
“In addition to its size and quality, Barrick’s asset base is distinguished by our continued success in more than replacing the reserves depleted by mining through brownfields exploration. At the same time, we continue to hunt for new Tier One assets across our expanding global footprint. The past quarter again produced promising results from all regions, with significant new potential identified in Nevada, Argentina and Africa’s Loulo district.”
Bristow said the Company’s latest annual Sustainability Report highlights its integrated approach to ESG, based on its belief that the challenges of poverty, climate change and biodiversity are intertwined and should be addressed holistically. The report notes that last year Barrick spent $5.5 billion with host country suppliers, equating to 81% of its global procurement expenditure. Host country nationals accounted for 96% of its total workforce and 78% of its management, and the drive to employ more women is succeeding.
Some $850 million has been spent on or budgeted for renewable energy and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction projects. These are outlined in the report in an updated GHG emissions reduction roadmap leading to a Net Zero target by 2050. Barrick, for the first time, has disclosed its Scope 3 emissions and Scope 3 roadmap to engage and assist its suppliers with their GHG emissions reductions.
“Sustainability has long been an integral part of the way Barrick does business and our commitment to its effective management is key to our goal of building the world’s most valued gold and copper mining company,” Bristow said.
Key Performance Indicators
Financial and Operating Highlights
Financial Results | Q1 2022 | Q4 2021 | Q1 2021 |
Realized gold price4 ($ per ounce) | 1,876 | 1,793 | 1,777 |
Net earnings ($ millions) | 438 | 726 | 538 |
Adjusted net earnings3 ($ millions) | 463 | 626 | 507 |
Net cash provided by operating activities ($ millions) | 1,004 | 1,387 | 1,302 |
Free cash flow1 ($ millions) | 393 | 718 | 763 |
Net earnings per share ($) | 0.25 | 0.41 | 0.30 |
Adjusted net earnings per share3 ($) | 0.26 | 0.35 | 0.29 |
Attributable capital expenditures5,6 ($ millions) | 478 | 552 | 424 |
Operating Results | Q1 2022 | Q4 2021 | Q1 2021 |
Gold | |||
Production7 (000s of ounces) | 990 | 1,203 | 1,101 |
Cost of sales (Barrick's share)7,8 ($ per ounce) | 1,190 | 1,075 | 1,073 |
Total cash costs7,9 ($ per ounce) | 832 | 715 | 716 |
All-in sustaining costs7,9 ($ per ounce) | 1,164 | 971 | 1,018 |
Copper | |||
Production6 (millions of pounds) | 101 | 126 | 93 |
Cost of sales (Barrick's share)7,8 ($ per pound) | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.11 |
C1 cash costs7,10 ($ per pound) | 1.81 | 1.63 | 1.60 |
All-in sustaining costs7,10 ($ per pound) | 2.85 | 2.92 | 2.26 |
Best Assets
Leader in Sustainability
Delivering Value
Q1 2022 Results Presentation
Webinar and Conference Call
President and CEO Mark Bristow will host a virtual presentation on the results today at 11:00 EDT, with an interactive webinar linked to a conference call. Participants will be able to ask questions.
Go to the webinar
US and Canada (toll-free), 1 800 319 4610
UK (toll-free), 0808 101 2791
International (toll), +1 416 915 3239
The Q1 2022 presentation materials will be available on Barrick’s website at www.barrick.com and the webinar will remain on the website for later viewing.
NEW PERFORMANCE DIVIDEND POLICY DOUBLES BARRICK’S QUARTERLY DIVIDEND
Barrick today announced the declaration of a dividend in respect of performance for the first quarter of 2022 that incorporates an enhancement to the base dividend as a result of achieving Level III under the Company’s Performance Dividend Policy.
Barrick’s Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.20 per share for the first quarter of 2022 that will be paid on June 15, 2022 to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 27, 2022.14 This dividend comprises a base quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share and a performance dividend enhancement of an additional $0.10 per share.
“Our strong operating performance and robust net cash balance has allowed us to provide an enhanced dividend to our shareholders,” says senior executive vice-president and chief financial officer Graham Shuttleworth. “We believe this shows the benefit of the Performance Dividend Policy that we announced in February, including the guidance it provides to our shareholders on future dividend streams.”
The $0.10 per share enhancement to the base quarterly dividend was achieved as a result of Barrick reporting net cash on its Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2022 of greater than $0.5 billion and less than $1 billion as per the following schedule:
Performance Dividend Level | Threshold Level | Quarterly Base Dividend | Quarterly Performance Dividend | Quarterly Total Dividend |
Level I | Net cash <$0 | $0.10 per share | $0.00 per share | $0.10 per share |
Level II | Net cash >$0 and <$0.5B | $0.10 per share | $0.05 per share | $0.15 per share |
Level III | Net cash >$0.5B and <$1B | $0.10 per share | $0.10 per share | $0.20 per share |
Level IV | Net cash >$1B | $0.10 per share | $0.15 per share | $0.25 per share |
STRATEGY SECURES BARRICK’S ABILITY TO SUCCEED AMID GLOBAL GEOPOLITICAL DYNAMICS AND IN CHALLENGING JURISDICTIONS
While Barrick’s core strategy — the creation and delivery of real, sustainable value to its stakeholders — is fixed, the actions needed to secure its consistent execution are subject to a rigorous review process.
This starts at the beginning of each year with a week-long strategic planning and team effectiveness review for the group’s top executives, led by president and chief executive Mark Bristow. Risks and opportunities are carefully assessed, and the outputs needed to manage them effectively are identified. These outputs are then rolled out through similar planning sessions at all operational and corporate sites, ensuring a group-wide alignment with the agreed objectives and actions.
This year’s group strategy session took particular note of the importance of risk management in a global environment which, says Bristow, is probably in greater political, social and economic disarray than any previous period since World War II.
“We’re still dealing with the fall-out of the Covid-19 pandemic, inflation in developed countries is rising to levels not experienced in a generation and in Eastern Europe a major war, the like of which we never expected to see again, is ongoing, with huge personal cost and potentially devastating economic consequences for the major countries dependent on Russian oil and gas,” says Bristow.
“Fortunately for Barrick, managing risks in challenging geo-political jurisdictions is one of our core competencies, largely gained in Africa, where our mines have continued to operate steadily and profitably through civil wars, coups d’état, complex logistics and delicate negotiations with host governments,” he says.
“It’s our partnership philosophy that has enabled us to achieve this. Mining is a long-term business and we therefore need the ability to benefit our host countries for the length of our investment and beyond. We secure this essential social licence to operate by demonstrating that the value we create is equitably shared with our local stakeholders and that we are a major contributor to the state’s coffers — in short, a welcome and responsible citizen and neighbour.”
Bristow says with mature mining regions offering fewer opportunities for major discoveries, new Tier One assets will inevitably have to be sought in developing countries, where Barrick is already operating successfully.
“Our decision to proceed with the reconstitution of the Reko Diq project in Pakistan, a Tier One copper and gold asset in the making by any measure, is based on this track record and on our confidence in our ability to deliver yet another world-class mine in a remote region. Our drive to expand our Asia-Pacific presence and grow our copper portfolio also sit firmly within this strategy,” he says.
INVESTING IN THE BEST PEOPLE FOR THE BEST FUTURE
“Getting the optimal results from the industry’s best assets requires people who not only possess skills and drive but are also sufficiently diverse in terms of race, age and gender to lead Barrick into the new world,” explains the Group Human Resources executive, Darian Rich.
Thanks to Barrick’s long-established policy of recruiting host country nationals, 96% of its workforce and 78% of its managers are local hires. Its drive for gender diversity in a traditionally male-dominated industry has also started producing results, with women accounting for 24% of new hires during the past quarter and 11% of Barrick’s global workforce.
Similarly, the employee age shift continues and 56% of the workforce are now under the age of 40 and 16% under the age of 30. In the past quarter, 38% of new hires were younger than 30.
Last quarter, the North America region participated in 36 recruiting events at schools and universities while Latin America’s internship programs cater for graduates as well as workers, with Veladero currently training 20 female truck drivers. In Africa and the Middle East, competency-based training programs continue to upskill workers.
Preparing the group’s future generation of leaders requires deep succession planning, reflected in a number of key recent changes. With Willem Jacobs retiring in June 2022, the region’s chief financial officer, Sebastiaan Bock, is stepping up as chief operating officer for Africa and the Middle East. Greg Walker is being succeeded as executive managing director of Nevada Gold Mines at the end of 2022 and, in the corporate office, Poupak Bahamin has been appointed general counsel while Rich Haddock transitions to a legal advisor role. Rich will remain a valuable resource through March 2024 to provide continuity of support for Reko Diq and other projects.
MANAGING COSTS AMID HIGH INFLATION AND GEOPOLITICAL CONFLICT
Rising inflation, exacerbated by the conflict between Russia and Ukraine and the sanctions imposed on Russia, has had a direct impact on Barrick’s business in terms not only of fuel and gas prices but also the cost and availability of input commodities.
To mitigate inflation and manage supply risks, Barrick is employing a proven multi-pronged strategy, says group commercial and supply chain executive Riaan Grobler.
“Our procurement strategy is built on a thorough understanding of our key cost drivers, commodities and services. The recent groupwide roll-out of SAP has improved the visibility of these factors and allowed real-time decision-making. At the same time, we are identifying technical levers that could drive internal efficiencies,” he says.
“Secondly, we have built strong collaborative relationships with leading global supply chain partners, with a dedicated freight forwarding capacity that spans five continents. They pool their buying power to ensure that we have fixed-price agreements with key suppliers. A big part of the cost of logistics is in the efficiency of the movement of goods from port to destination and we leverage global logistics through our partnership structures to do cross-continent bookings of charters and to consolidate freight from multiple ports.”
Barrick is also cultivating alternative suppliers, particularly in developing countries, as back-up to its main supply chain partners and as a cost-base benchmark. Its long-standing policy of local procurement in host countries, which now stands at 65% of its global procurement, is serving Barrick well as a hedge against inflation, particularly in terms of the cost of logistics, tariffs and inventory.
To manage price and supply volatility, Barrick has built up a strategic inventory of key commodities and Barrick optimizes this inventory and its cost through improved demand and maintenance planning. Where possible it also leverages new projects to renegotiate supply contracts. The proposed 200MW solar power project in Nevada, for example, has allowed Barrick to reduce the costs of the existing energy supplier for Nevada Gold Mines.
TRUE PARTNERSHIP WILL DELIVER REKO DIQ PROJECT
The groundbreaking partnership agreement between Barrick, the federal government of Pakistan and the provincial government of Balochistan should unlock the enormous value of Reko Diq, one of the world’s largest undeveloped copper and gold deposits, says president and chief executive Mark Bristow.
Speaking on a recent investor call, Bristow said the project represented a unique mining opportunity, which would be a major addition to Barrick’s Tier One asset base, while also bringing significant economic and social benefits to Pakistan and Balochistan.
The agreement in principle recently reached between the parties provides for the reconstitution and restart of the project, which has been on hold since 2011. It will be operated and owned 50% by Barrick, 25% by Pakistani state-owned enterprises and 25% by the government of Balochistan. The Company has similar partnerships in other countries which have proved to be catalysts in developing local economies.
Bristow said that, following the finalization of the underlying agreements, legalization and closing, Barrick would update the 2010 feasibility study.
“Reko Diq’s fundamentals have not changed materially since then. Subject to the updated feasibility study, it is still envisaged as a conventional open pit and milling operation producing a high-quality copper-gold concentrate. We are planning a two-phase construction approach, starting with an approximately 40 million tonne per annum plant, which could be doubled within five years. The staged development will optimize returns, manage upfront capital, lower execution risk and bring forward production and cash flows in the long run. If all goes according to plan, we anticipate first production in five to six years’ time,” he said.
“Offering a unique combination of large scale, low strip and good grade, Reko Diq will be a multi-generational mine, with a life of at least 40 years. The contemplated mine plan is based on four porphyry deposits within our land package and our exploration licence area holds additional deposits with future upside potential.”
Noting that since 2010 there had been game-changing technological advances in renewable energy alternatives, some of which are particularly well-suited to the area, Bristow said a Barrick team was already assessing various solar, wind and battery configurations to maximize the mine’s renewable power generation. This could also deliver a range of economic and operational benefits.
The development of Reko Diq will make Balochistan the largest recipient of foreign investment in Pakistan. During peak construction periods, the project is expected to employ 7,500 people and once in production will create about 4,000 long-term jobs. Barrick’s policy of prioritizing local employment and suppliers will have a positive downstream impact on the local economy.
“At Barrick we know that our long-term success depends on sharing the benefits we create equitably with our host governments and communities. That’s why we wanted Balochistan’s share of the venture to be fully funded, 10% by the project and 15% by the government of Pakistan. It’s equally important to us that Balochistan and its people should see the benefits from day one. Even before construction begins, we will be implementing a range of social development programs, supported by upfront commitments to the development of the skills required for mining, the improvement of education, healthcare, food security and, importantly, access to potable water in a region where the groundwater has a high saline content,” Bristow said.
KIBALI POWERS AHEAD WHILE BARRICK PLANS FURTHER INVESTMENTS IN DRC
Africa’s largest gold mine, Kibali in the DRC, has made a strong start to 2022 and is on track to equal its 2021 production this year. Last year it again replaced the reserves depleted by mining and its prolific KZ trend of orebodies continues to deliver opportunities for significant open pit and underground growth.
Speaking to media and other stakeholders in Kinshasa, Barrick president and chief executive Mark Bristow said Kibali had notched up a number of other key deliverables during the current quarter. These include the signing of a cahier de charge with the surrounding communities to formalize their role in identifying and overseeing the mine’s investment in social development projects.
Another section of the Durba road to Watsa has been completed and the resettlement of the Kalimva-Ikamva and Pamao villages has started with the first group of people moving into their new homes. On the health and safety front, there were zero lost time injuries during the quarter, the malaria and HIV programs continued to deliver infection rate reductions and 60% of our employees have been vaccinated against Covid-19, versus a national average of 1%.
In addition to Kibali’s long-standing support for conservation measures in one of DRC’s leading national parks, African Parks and Barrick are looking to reintroduce the white rhino to the Garamba National Park. In what will be the largest exercise of its kind, the plan envisages the relocation of around 50 white rhinos to Garamba creating a new population group which is critical in the long-term plan to protect this species. In line with Barrick’s development strategy, the mine also launched the Garamba Alliance in partnership with the US Agency for International Development (USAID).
Since the project that became Kibali was acquired in 2009, its probable mineral reserves were doubled to more than 10 million ounces15 of gold in 2010. Construction then started the following year, three hydropower plants were built and the infrastructure — including the road to the Ugandan border — was developed. The mine went into production in 2013 and still today has more than 10 years of mine life ahead, with 2021 total proven and probable mineral reserves of 83Mt at 3.60g/t for 9.6Moz16 of gold, before considering extensions to known orebodies and new discoveries. Since 2009, Kibali has invested almost $4 billion in the DRC in the form of royalties, taxes and permits; infrastructure and community development; salaries; and payments to local suppliers and contractors, which have created a thriving regional economy.
“Barrick is continuing to invest in the DRC, not only by developing the many new growth opportunities which are extending Kibali’s life, but also through pursuing greenfields exploration and other opportunities across the country as we search for our next world-class discovery,” Bristow said.
HOLISTIC APPROACH TO ESG WILL MAKE LASTING IMPACT
Barrick has an integrated approach to sustainability to address each of the Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) components concurrently, says group sustainability executive Grant Beringer in the Company’s 2021 Sustainability Report.
“The challenges of fighting poverty, climate change and biodiversity loss are deeply connected, and we have no option but to tackle them together through a holistic and integrated approach to sustainability management, if we are to make a lasting, positive impact on any of them,” he says.
“While excellent management of environmental aspects is critical for sustainable delivery, this only focuses on one side of the issue. That is why this report has a strong focus on the ‘silent S’ in ESG, demonstrating that responsible mining is an enormous lever for delivering social upliftment and development.”
Barrick achieved a ‘B’ grade for a third consecutive year in its industry-first Sustainability Scorecard and recorded significant improvements across most of its key metrics. Highlights for the year include the certification of all operational sites to the ISO 45001 and ISO 14001 standards and the procurement of goods and services worth $1.67 billion from local suppliers close to Barrick’s operations. In total, $5.5 billion was spent on host country suppliers, equating to 81% of Barrick’s global procurement spend. Further details of Barrick’s economic value contribution, including taxes paid, is included in its standalone Tax Contribution Report for 2021. Host country nationals now comprise 96% of its workforce and the group maintained its downward trend in the Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate.17
Additionally, approximately $850 million has been spent or budgeted for renewable energy and GHG emissions reduction projects, all of which meet the Company’s required 15% internal rate of return. The report also contains an updated GHG Reduction Roadmap, outlining the projects that decrease emissions against Barrick’s 2018 baseline by at least 30% by 2030, while maintaining a steady production profile, as well as its course to be Net-Zero by 2050. It also details Barrick’s first-ever disclosure of its Scope 3 emissions and Scope 3 roadmap to engaging and assisting its suppliers with their GHG emissions reduction. Barrick’s water efficiency rate, a measure of the amount of water it reuses and recycles, was 82% for 2021.
Meanwhile, its new Biodiversity Standard, focused on driving positive biodiversity outcomes in critically important areas, has resulted in a significant increase in key species populations in the Garamba National Park in the Democratic Republic of Congo near its Kibali mine. Barrick, through its partnership with African Parks and the Congolese Institute for the Conservation of Nature (ICCN), is also the sole sponsor to reintroduce white rhino to the park in 2022.
“Conserving biodiversity is fundamental to planetary survival, essential to tackling climate change and has an important role to play in the war on poverty. We strive not only to preserve and maintain biodiversity within our permits but to partner with NGOs and other organizations, to protect and restore critical biodiversity in some of the world’s most ecologically sensitive places,” says Beringer.
The latest report is now aligned to the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board’s (SASB) reporting requirements for metals and mining and continues to conform to the Global Reporting Initiative’s ‘GRI Standards: Core option’ as well as the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework.
FUNDING THE RE-INTRODUCTION OF WHITE RHINOS TO THE GARAMBA NATIONAL PARK IN THE DRC
Measurable conservation action focused on threatened species abatement and restoration
Barrick wants to restore the white rhino population at the Garamba National Park in the DRC and has partnered with African Parks and the Congolese Institute for the Conservation of Nature (ICCN) to fund the transfer of at least 50 rhinos from South Africa in 2022.
The Garamba National Park, located 70km north of the Kibali mine in the north-east of the DRC, covers an area greater than 5,000km2 and is adjacent to four contiguous reserves with an additional 10,000km2. It is one of Africa’s oldest national parks and a UNESCO World Heritage Site. The park has been placed on the list of World Heritage Sites in danger, following years of armed conflict, civil wars and poaching that has resulted in steep declines in its wildlife populations.
Barrick has provided support to the park since 2015, with a view to protecting and restoring its biodiversity and resulting in a notable improvement in the herd size of the endangered Kordofan giraffe, which has grown from 22 individuals in 2012 to 65 last year. Similarly, buffalo populations have also steadily grown with average herd sizes ranging from 20 to nearly 500 individuals. Furthermore, there has not been an instance of elephant poaching since September 2020.
UPDATED GHG ROADMAP OUTLINES JOURNEY TO 2050
Sun to help power journey to Net Zero
Solar power will account for approximately a third of the total reduction in the GHG emissions that Barrick plans to achieve by 2030, according to the latest GHG Reduction Roadmap published in its 2021 Sustainability Report.
Barrick’s GHG Reduction Roadmap outlines the renewable energy projects that are contributing to or have the potential to help meet its target of reducing total emissions by 30% by 2030 as well as its course to be Net Zero by 2050. Solar power is expected to account for 681kt of the 2,262kt Barrick needs to reduce its total annual GHG emissions to 5,279kt CO2e by 2030 against a 2018 baseline of 7,541kt CO2e.
In addition to the 20MW solar power plant at Loulo (27kt estimated reduction of CO2e per year) completed in 2020, work has begun on an estimated $262 million 200MW solar facility with battery storage in Nevada. The facility is expected to satisfy approximately 15% of Nevada Gold Mines’ (NGM) total electricity requirements and should reduce Barrick’s GHG emissions by 254kt per year, which is equivalent to taking almost 34,000 cars off the road.
Other projects being investigated include expansions to the solar plants at Loulo (54kt estimated reduction of CO2e) and Nevada (254kt CO2e), as well as additional solar installations at Jabal Sayid (11kt estimated reduction of CO2e), Kibali (12kt estimated reduction of CO2e) and Pueblo Viejo (69kt estimated reduction of CO2e). Approximately $850 million has been spent or budgeted for renewable energy and GHG emissions reduction projects, all of which meet the Company’s required 15% internal rate of return.
PUEBLO VIEJO MOVES FORWARD WITH LIFE OF MINE EXTENSION PROJECT
The Dominican Government has completed its strategic review of the location of the new Tailings Storage Facility (TSF) for the Pueblo Viejo mine in the Dominican Republic. The new TSF forms part of the expansion project that is designed to extend the Tier One mine’s life to beyond 2040 and support annual production in excess of 800,000 ounces.13
The government, through their process, have identified a select number of alternatives for further assessment. At the same time, Barrick conducted its own alternatives assessment, completed by a multidisciplinary team of external subject matter experts from various independent consulting companies.
Several sites were initially identified and after various screening phases, which considered environmental, social, and technical factors, potentially feasible sites were identified for further evaluation. The two separate assessments independently identified four alternative sites, of which two sites, located in the Sanchez Ramirez Province, would be put forward for further investigation.
Barrick president and chief executive Mark Bristow said that although these alternative sites existed as determined by the reviews, the final location and construction of the facility would be subject to the completion of an Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) in accordance with Dominican Republic legislation and international standards. Once completed, the ESIA would be submitted to the government for evaluation and final decision.
The ESIA will identify and implement mechanisms to mitigate potential environmental impacts as well as initiatives to improve the livelihoods of the communities. Barrick is committed to following international standards and will adhere to the Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management in terms of design, construction, operation, and closure of the tailings storage facility.
The new TSF would enable operations at Pueblo Viejo to continue beyond 2040. As a major creator of value for the Dominican Republic, the project will stop the decline in production, and will facilitate the continued payment of taxes, exportation, jobs, national and local purchases, and social benefits the mine brings to the country.
In 2021, the Tier One mine paid $527 million in direct and indirect taxes which brings total tax payments since 2013 to more than $3 billion.
“Our goal in the Dominican Republic, as elsewhere in the world, is to create long-term value for all our stakeholders through our strategy of sustainable development. Pueblo Viejo’s expansion project is expected to increase total direct and indirect taxes to over $9 billion from the beginning of commercial production in 2013 through to the extended life of mine beyond 204018,” Bristow said.
BARRICK ANNUAL REPORT PUBLISHED
The 2021 Annual Report was published in March
Barrick’s 2021 Annual Report, Annual Information Form and Form 40-F are available on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and EDGAR (www.sec.gov), respectively. Updated National Instrument 43-101 technical reports for each of the Kibali Gold Mine and the Cortez Complex, current as of December 31, 2021, are also available on SEDAR and EDGAR.
To access the above-mentioned documents, please visit www.barrick.com. Shareholders may also receive a copy of Barrick’s audited financial statements without charge upon request to Barrick’s Investor Relations Department, 161 Bay Street, Suite 3700, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2S1 or to investor@barrick.com.
Barrick expands global footprint in hunt for high-quality assets
Barrick is continuing to invest in its future through the development of capital projects that will expand and enhance an operating platform which already holds some of the industry’s best assets, says president and chief executive Mark Bristow.
Writing in the Company’s 2021 Annual Report Bristow says that, while building on this value foundation, Barrick was also expanding its presence into new prospective areas in its hunt for high-quality assets.
“A specialist Asia-Pacific team, set up to look at opportunities in that region, has acquired exploration permits in Japan and are hunting for additional opportunities in that region. We are also investigating projects across the Nubian and Arabian Shields in North Africa and the Middle East. We have put a particularly strong focus on exploration in Latin America, where our teams are testing a portfolio of targets on the El Indio belt along the border between Argentina and Chile. We have also added ground in Peru and started fieldwork on new projects in Guyana and Suriname.”
“We are working on a well-defined strategy to grow our business in Canada where I believe we are under-invested. A significant exploration portfolio has been secured in the country’s Uchi Belt and the team is also looking at other opportunities in the country.”
Bristow says Barrick has mapped out and is advancing on a clear road to achievable GHG emissions reduction targets and its long-standing commitment to ESG principles informs all its business decisions.
“The Social component of ESG tends to be overshadowed by its Environmental counterpart, but for Barrick it is the socio-economic state of our less-developed host countries that is critically important, and much of our sustainability strategy is directed at ensuring that our host communities are not negatively impacted by the world’s transition to a green economy.”
“Our drive to employ the next generation of mining talent remained steady, with 56% of our workforce now under the age of 40 and 19%[19] under 30. Throughout the period we also continued to increase our gender diversity, and last year 17% of new hires globally were women. Barrick believes in empowering our people to thrive in a decentralized structure with lean regional teams designed for agility and focused on creating value for all our stakeholders,” says Bristow.
Barrick set to deliver substantial future free cash flows
Barrick is built on a foundation of six Tier One gold mines with rolling 10-year plans which secure the Company’s ability to generate substantial free cash flows[1] for the next decade and beyond, says executive chairman John Thornton.
Writing in the Company’s 2021 Annual Report, Thornton notes that in September 2018, when the Randgold merger was announced, Barrick had net debt in excess of $4 billion. Since then, it has not only moved into a net cash position but has returned $2.5 billion of cash to shareholders, including last year’s record distribution of $1.4 billion.
“As previously announced, after careful consideration of our capital allocation, the board has settled on a new dividend policy comprising a base dividend with an additional performance dividend linked to the net cash on the balance sheet, starting in 2022. We believe this will give our shareholders guidance on future dividend streams14,” he says.
“The board has also approved a $1 billion share buyback plan which will afford us the opportunity to acquire our shares when they are trading below what we consider to be their intrinsic value.”[20]
S&P UPGRADES BARRICK TO BBB+ WITH STABLE OUTLOOK
S&P Global Ratings has upgraded Barrick’s long-term corporate credit rating to BBB+ from BBB, with a stable outlook. This follows a similar upgrade to Baa1 by Moody’s Investors Service in October 2020.
Appendix 1
2022 Operating and Capital Expenditure Guidance
GOLD PRODUCTION AND COSTS | ||||
2022 forecast attributable production (000s oz) | 2022 forecast cost of sales8 ($/oz) | 2022 forecast total cash costs9 ($/oz) | 2022 forecast all-in sustaining costs9 ($/oz) | |
Carlin (61.5%)21 | 950 - 1,030 | 900 - 980 | 730 - 790 | 1,020 - 1,100 |
Cortez (61.5%)22 | 480 - 530 | 970 - 1,050 | 650 - 710 | 1,010 - 1,090 |
Turquoise Ridge (61.5%) | 330 - 370 | 1,110 - 1,190 | 770 - 830 | 930 - 1,010 |
Phoenix (61.5%) | 90 - 120 | 2,000 - 2,080 | 720 - 780 | 890 - 970 |
Long Canyon (61.5%) | 40 - 50 | 1,420 - 1,500 | 540 - 600 | 540 - 620 |
Nevada Gold Mines (61.5%) | 1,900 - 2,100 | 1,020 - 1,100 | 710 - 770 | 990 - 1,070 |
Hemlo | 160 - 180 | 1,340 - 1,420 | 1,140 - 1,200 | 1,510 - 1,590 |
North America | 2,100 - 2,300 | 1,050 - 1,130 | 740 - 800 | 1,040 - 1,120 |
Pueblo Viejo (60%) | 400 - 440 | 1,070 - 1,150 | 670 - 730 | 910 - 990 |
Veladero (50%) | 220 - 240 | 1,210 - 1,290 | 740 - 800 | 1,270 - 1,350 |
Porgera (47.5%)23 | — | — | — | — |
Latin America & Asia Pacific | 620 - 680 | 1,140 - 1,220 | 700 - 760 | 1,040 - 1,120 |
Loulo-Gounkoto (80%) | 510 - 560 | 1,070 - 1,150 | 680 - 740 | 940 - 1,020 |
Kibali (45%) | 340 - 380 | 990 - 1,070 | 600 - 660 | 800 - 880 |
North Mara (84%) | 230 - 260 | 820 - 900 | 670 - 730 | 930 - 1,010 |
Tongon (89.7%) | 170 - 200 | 1,700 - 1,780 | 1,220 - 1,280 | 1,400 - 1,480 |
Bulyanhulu (84%) | 180 - 210 | 950 - 1,030 | 630 - 690 | 850 - 930 |
Africa & Middle East | 1,450 - 1,600 | 1,070 - 1,150 | 720 - 780 | 950 - 1,030 |
Total Attributable to Barrick24,25,26 | 4,200 - 4,600 | 1,070 - 1,150 | 730 - 790 | 1,040 - 1,120 |
COPPER PRODUCTION AND COSTS | ||||
2022 forecast attributable production (Mlbs) | 2022 forecast cost of sales8 ($/lb) | 2022 forecast C1 cash costs10 ($/lb) | 2022 forecast all-in sustaining costs10 ($/lb) | |
Lumwana | 250 - 280 | 2.20 - 2.50 | 1.60 - 1.80 | 3.10 - 3.40 |
Zaldívar (50%) | 100 - 120 | 2.70 - 3.00 | 2.00 - 2.20 | 2.50 - 2.80 |
Jabal Sayid (50%) | 70 - 80 | 1.40 - 1.70 | 1.30 - 1.50 | 1.30 - 1.60 |
Total Attributable to Barrick25 | 420 - 470 | 2.20 - 2.50 | 1.70 - 1.90 | 2.70 - 3.00 |
ATTRIBUTABLE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES | ||||
($ millions) | ||||
Attributable minesite sustaining6 | 1,350 - 1,550 | |||
Attributable project6 | 550 - 650 | |||
Total attributable capital expenditures7 | 1,900 - 2,200 |
2022 OUTLOOK ASSUMPTIONS AND ECONOMIC SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
2022 Guidance Assumption | Hypothetical Change | Impact on EBITDA27 (millions) | Impact on TCC and AISC9,10 | |
Gold price sensitivity | $1,700/oz | +/- $100/oz | +/- $580 | +/- $5/oz |
Copper price sensitivity | $4.00/lb | +/- $0.25/lb | +/- $60 | +/- $0.01/lb |
Appendix 2
Production and Cost Summary - Gold
For the three months ended | |||||||||
3/31/22 | 12/31/21 | % Change | 3/31/21 | % Change | |||||
Nevada Gold Mines LLC (61.5%)a | |||||||||
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) | 459 | 604 | (24)% | 485 | (5)% | ||||
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) | 747 | 981 | (24)% | 789 | (5)% | ||||
Cost of sales ($/oz) | 1,169 | 1,023 | 14% | 1,047 | 12% | ||||
Total cash costs ($/oz)b | 820 | 687 | 19% | 686 | 20% | ||||
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b | 1,118 | 893 | 25% | 932 | 20% | ||||
Carlin (61.5%)c | |||||||||
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) | 229 | 295 | (22)% | 229 | 0% | ||||
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) | 373 | 479 | (22)% | 373 | 0% | ||||
Cost of sales ($/oz) | 1,015 | 899 | 13% | 950 | 7% | ||||
Total cash costs ($/oz)b | 829 | 728 | 14% | 766 | 8% | ||||
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b | 1,139 | 950 | 20% | 1,045 | 9% | ||||
Cortez (61.5%)d | |||||||||
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) | 115 | 169 | (32)% | 100 | 15% | ||||
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) | 187 | 275 | (32)% | 163 | 15% | ||||
Cost of sales ($/oz) | 1,113 | 984 | 13% | 1,251 | (11)% | ||||
Total cash costs ($/oz)b | 784 | 657 | 19% | 860 | (9)% | ||||
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b | 1,150 | 853 | 35% | 1,203 | (4)% | ||||
Turquoise Ridge (61.5%) | |||||||||
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) | 67 | 82 | (18)% | 92 | (27)% | ||||
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) | 109 | 133 | (18)% | 149 | (27)% | ||||
Cost of sales ($/oz) | 1,436 | 1,194 | 20% | 1,007 | 43% | ||||
Total cash costs ($/oz)b | 1,030 | 819 | 26% | 647 | 59% | ||||
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b | 1,281 | 996 | 29% | 741 | 73% | ||||
Phoenix (61.5%)c | |||||||||
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) | 23 | 25 | (8)% | 25 | (8)% | ||||
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) | 37 | 41 | (8)% | 41 | (8)% | ||||
Cost of sales ($/oz) | 2,253 | 2,047 | 10% | 2,051 | 10% | ||||
Total cash costs ($/oz)b | 835 | 443 | 88% | 346 | 141% | ||||
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b | 1,027 | 614 | 67% | 530 | 94% | ||||
Long Canyon (61.5%) | |||||||||
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) | 25 | 33 | (24)% | 39 | (36)% | ||||
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) | 41 | 53 | (24)% | 63 | (36)% | ||||
Cost of sales ($/oz) | 1,093 | 999 | 9% | 511 | 114% | ||||
Total cash costs ($/oz)b | 342 | 325 | 5% | 79 | 333% | ||||
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b | 366 | 384 | (5)% | 156 | 135% | ||||
Pueblo Viejo (60%) | |||||||||
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) | 104 | 107 | (3)% | 137 | (24)% | ||||
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) | 174 | 178 | (3)% | 229 | (24)% | ||||
Cost of sales ($/oz) | 1,077 | 987 | 9% | 816 | 32% | ||||
Total cash costs ($/oz)b | 682 | 612 | 11% | 507 | 35% | ||||
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b | 948 | 858 | 10% | 689 | 38% | ||||
Loulo-Gounkoto (80%) |
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) | 138 | 126 | 10% | 154 | (10)% | |||
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) | 172 | 158 | 10% | 193 | (10)% | |||
Cost of sales ($/oz) | 1,088 | 1,139 | (4)% | 974 | 12% | |||
Total cash costs ($/oz)b | 721 | 685 | 5% | 608 | 19% | |||
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b | 982 | 822 | 19% | 920 | 7% | |||
Kibali (45%) | ||||||||
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) | 76 | 94 | (19)% | 86 | (12)% | |||
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) | 168 | 209 | (19)% | 192 | (12)% | |||
Cost of sales ($/oz) | 1,137 | 979 | 16% | 1,065 | 7% | |||
Total cash costs ($/oz)b | 744 | 582 | 28% | 691 | 8% | |||
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b | 996 | 776 | 28% | 856 | 16% | |||
Veladero (50%) | ||||||||
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) | 46 | 61 | (25)% | 32 | 44% | |||
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) | 92 | 122 | (25)% | 64 | 44% | |||
Cost of sales ($/oz) | 1,348 | 1,279 | 5% | 1,151 | 17% | |||
Total cash costs ($/oz)b | 847 | 834 | 2% | 736 | 15% | |||
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b | 1,588 | 1,113 | 43% | 2,104 | (25) % | |||
Porgera (47.5%)e | ||||||||
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) | — | — | —% | — | —% | |||
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) | — | — | —% | — | —% | |||
Cost of sales ($/oz) | — | — | —% | — | —% | |||
Total cash costs ($/oz)b | — | — | —% | — | —% | |||
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b | — | — | —% | — | —% | |||
Tongon (89.7%) | ||||||||
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) | 35 | 50 | (30)% | 48 | (27)% | |||
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) | 39 | 56 | (30)% | 54 | (27)% | |||
Cost of sales ($/oz) | 2,036 | 1,494 | 36% | 1,510 | 35% | |||
Total cash costs ($/oz)b | 1,667 | 1,205 | 38% | 995 | 68% | |||
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b | 1,803 | 1,301 | 39% | 1,062 | 70% | |||
Hemlo | ||||||||
Gold produced (000s oz) | 31 | 35 | (11)% | 47 | (34)% | |||
Cost of sales ($/oz) | 1,727 | 1,770 | (2)% | 1,610 | 7% | |||
Total cash costs ($/oz)b | 1,503 | 1,481 | 1% | 1,324 | 14% | |||
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b | 1,982 | 1,938 | 2% | 1,840 | 8% | |||
North Mara (84%) | ||||||||
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) | 56 | 69 | (19)% | 62 | (10)% | |||
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) | 66 | 82 | (19)% | 74 | (10)% | |||
Cost of sales ($/oz) | 852 | 858 | (1)% | 1,061 | (20)% | |||
Total cash costs ($/oz)b | 709 | 679 | 4% | 832 | (15)% | |||
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b | 874 | 1,033 | (15)% | 1,038 | (16)% | |||
Buzwagi (84%)f |
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) | 17 | ||||
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) | 20 | ||||
Cost of sales ($/oz) | 1,486 | ||||
Total cash costs ($/oz)b | 1,450 | ||||
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b | 1,467 | ||||
Bulyanhulu (84%) | |||||
Gold produced (000s oz attributable basis) | 45 | 57 | (21)% | 33 | 36% |
Gold produced (000s oz 100% basis) | 53 | 68 | (21)% | 39 | 36% |
Cost of sales ($/oz) | 1,216 | 956 | 27% | 1,211 | 0% |
Total cash costs ($/oz)b | 847 | 567 | 49% | 865 | (2)% |
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b | 984 | 897 | 10% | 957 | 3% |
Total Attributable to Barrickg | |||||
Gold produced (000s oz) | 990 | 1,203 | (18)% | 1,101 | (10)% |
Cost of sales ($/oz)h | 1,190 | 1,075 | 11% | 1,073 | 11% |
Total cash costs ($/oz)b | 832 | 715 | 16% | 716 | 16% |
All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)b | 1,164 | 971 | 20% | 1,018 | 14% |
Production and Cost Summary - Copper
For the three months ended | |||||
3/31/22 | 12/31/21 | % Change | 3/31/21 | % Change | |
Lumwana | |||||
Copper production (Mlbs) | 57 | 78 | (27)% | 51 | 12% |
Cost of sales ($/lb) | 2.20 | 2.16 | 2% | 1.97 | 12% |
C1 cash costs ($/lb)a | 1.86 | 1.54 | 21% | 1.48 | 26% |
All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)a | 3.16 | 3.29 | (4)% | 2.37 | 33% |
Zaldívar (50%) | |||||
Copper production (Mlbs attributable basis) | 25 | 27 | (7)% | 24 | 4% |
Copper production (Mlbs 100% basis) | 51 | 54 | (7)% | 48 | 4% |
Cost of sales ($/lb) | 2.85 | 3.14 | (9)% | 3.03 | (6)% |
C1 cash costs ($/lb)a | 2.15 | 2.35 | (9)% | 2.25 | (4)% |
All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)a | 2.64 | 3.42 | (23)% | 2.47 | 7% |
Jabal Sayid (50%) | |||||
Copper production (Mlbs attributable basis) | 19 | 21 | (10)% | 18 | 6% |
Copper production (Mlbs 100% basis) | 38 | 42 | (10)% | 36 | 6% |
Cost of sales ($/lb) | 1.30 | 1.36 | (4)% | 1.21 | 7% |
C1 cash costs ($/lb)a | 1.10 | 1.11 | (1)% | 1.06 | 4% |
All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)a | 1.17 | 1.27 | (8)% | 1.22 | (4)% |
Total Attributable to Barrick | |||||
Copper production (Mlbs attributable basis) | 101 | 126 | (20)% | 93 | 9% |
Cost of sales ($/lb)b | 2.21 | 2.21 | 0% | 2.11 | 5% |
C1 cash costs ($/lb)a | 1.81 | 1.63 | 11% | 1.60 | 13% |
All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)a | 2.85 | 2.92 | (2)% | 2.26 | 26% |
Appendix 3
Financial and Operating Highlights
For the three months ended | |||||||||||
3/31/22 | 12/31/21 | % Change | 3/31/21 | % Change | |||||||
Financial Results ($ millions) | |||||||||||
Revenues | 2,853 | 3,310 | (14 | )% | 2,956 | (3 | )% | ||||
Cost of sales | 1,739 | 1,905 | (9 | )% | 1,712 | 2 | % | ||||
Net earningsa | 438 | 726 | (40 | )% | 538 | (19 | )% | ||||
Adjusted net earningsb | 463 | 626 | (26 | )% | 507 | (9 | )% | ||||
Adjusted EBITDAb | 1,645 | 2,070 | (21 | )% | 1,800 | (9 | )% | ||||
Adjusted EBITDA marginc | 58 | % | 63 | % | (8 | )% | 61 | % | (5 | )% | |
Minesite sustaining capital expendituresb,d | 420 | 431 | (3 | )% | 405 | 4 | % | ||||
Project capital expendituresb,d | 186 | 234 | (21 | )% | 131 | 42 | % | ||||
Total consolidated capital expendituresd,e | 611 | 669 | (9 | )% | 539 | 13 | % | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 1,004 | 1,387 | (28 | )% | 1,302 | (23 | )% | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities marginf | 35 | % | 42 | % | (17 | )% | 44 | % | (20 | )% | |
Free cash flowb | 393 | 718 | (45 | )% | 763 | (48 | )% | ||||
Net earnings per share (basic and diluted) | 0.25 | 0.41 | (39 | )% | 0.30 | (17 | )% | ||||
Adjusted net earnings (basic)b per share | 0.26 | 0.35 | (26 | )% | 0.29 | (10 | )% | ||||
Weighted average diluted common shares (millions of shares) | 1,779 | 1,779 | 0 | % | 1,778 | 0 | % | ||||
Operating Results | |||||||||||
Gold production (thousands of ounces)g | 990 | 1,203 | (18 | )% | 1,101 | (10 | )% | ||||
Gold sold (thousands of ounces)g | 993 | 1,234 | (20 | )% | 1,093 | (9 | )% | ||||
Market gold price ($/oz) | 1,877 | 1,795 | 5 | % | 1,794 | 5 | % | ||||
Realized gold priceb,g ($/oz) | 1,876 | 1,793 | 5 | % | 1,777 | 6 | % | ||||
Gold cost of sales (Barrick’s share)g,h ($/oz) | 1,190 | 1,075 | 11 | % | 1,073 | 11 | % | ||||
Gold total cash costsb,g ($/oz) | 832 | 715 | 16 | % | 716 | 16 | % | ||||
Gold all-in sustaining costsb,g ($/oz) | 1,164 | 971 | 20 | % | 1,018 | 14 | % | ||||
Copper production (millions of pounds)g | 101 | 126 | (20 | )% | 93 | 9 | % | ||||
Copper sold (millions of pounds)g | 113 | 113 | 0 | % | 113 | 0 | % | ||||
Market copper price ($/lb) | 4.53 | 4.40 | 3 | % | 3.86 | 17 | % | ||||
Realized copper priceb,g ($/lb) | 4.68 | 4.63 | 1 | % | 4.12 | 14 | % | ||||
Copper cost of sales (Barrick’s share)g,i ($/lb) | 2.21 | 2.21 | 0 | % | 2.11 | 5 | % | ||||
Copper C1 cash costsb,g ($/lb) | 1.81 | 1.63 | 11 | % | 1.60 | 13 | % | ||||
Copper all-in sustaining costsb,g ($/lb) | 2.85 | 2.92 | (2 | )% | 2.26 | 26 | % | ||||
As at 3/31/22 | As at 12/31/21 | % Change | As at 3/31/21 | % Change | |||||||
Financial Position ($ millions) | |||||||||||
Debt (current and long-term) | 5,144 | 5,150 | 0 | % | 5,153 | 0 | % | ||||
Cash and equivalents | 5,887 | 5,280 | 11 | % | 5,672 | 4 | % | ||||
Debt, net of cash | (743 | ) | (130 | ) | 472 | % | (519 | ) | 43 | % |
Consolidated Statements of Income
Barrick Gold Corporation (in millions of United States dollars, except per share data) (Unaudited) | Three months ended March 31, | |||||
2022 | 2021 | |||||
Revenue (notes 5 and 6) | $2,853 | $2,956 | ||||
Costs and expenses (income) | ||||||
Cost of sales (notes 5 and 7) | 1,739 | 1,712 | ||||
General and administrative expenses | 54 | 38 | ||||
Exploration, evaluation and project expenses | 67 | 61 | ||||
Impairment (reversals) charges (notes 9b and 13) | 2 | (89 | ) | |||
Loss on currency translation | 3 | 4 | ||||
Closed mine rehabilitation | 3 | 23 | ||||
Income from equity investees (note 12) | (99 | ) | (103 | ) | ||
Other (income) expense (note 9a) | (11 | ) | 19 | |||
Income before finance costs and income taxes | $1,095 | $1,291 | ||||
Finance costs, net | (88 | ) | (87 | ) | ||
Income before income taxes | $1,007 | $1,204 | ||||
Income tax expense (note 10) | (301 | ) | (374 | ) | ||
Net income | $706 | $830 | ||||
Attributable to: | ||||||
Equity holders of Barrick Gold Corporation | $438 | $538 | ||||
Non-controlling interests (note 16) | $268 | $292 | ||||
Earnings per share data attributable to the equity holders of Barrick Gold Corporation (note 8) | ||||||
Net income | ||||||
Basic | $0.25 | $0.30 | ||||
Diluted | $0.25 | $0.30 |
The notes to these unaudited condensed interim financial statements, which are contained in the First Quarter Report 2022 available on our website, are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Barrick Gold Corporation (in millions of United States dollars) (Unaudited) | Three months ended March 31, | |||||
2022 | 2021 | |||||
Net income | $706 | $830 | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of taxes | ||||||
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss: | ||||||
Net change on equity investments, net of tax ($8) and $8 | 58 | (47 | ) | |||
Total other comprehensive income (loss) | 58 | (47 | ) | |||
Total comprehensive income | $764 | $783 | ||||
Attributable to: | ||||||
Equity holders of Barrick Gold Corporation | $496 | $491 | ||||
Non-controlling interests | $268 | $292 |
The notes to these unaudited condensed interim financial statements, which are contained in the First Quarter Report 2022 available on our website, are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow
Barrick Gold Corporation (in millions of United States dollars) (Unaudited) | Three months ended March 31, | |||||
2022 | 2021 | |||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||||
Net income | $706 | $830 | ||||
Adjustments for the following items: | ||||||
Depreciation | 460 | 507 | ||||
Finance costs, net | 98 | 94 | ||||
Impairment (reversals) charges (notes 9b and 13) | 2 | (89 | ) | |||
Income tax expense (note 10) | 301 | 374 | ||||
Income from equity investees (note 12) | (99 | ) | (103 | ) | ||
Gain on sale of non-current assets | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | ||
Loss on currency translation | 3 | 4 | ||||
Change in working capital (note 11) | (131 | ) | (58 | ) | ||
Other operating activities (note 11) | (77 | ) | (34 | ) | ||
Operating cash flows before interest and income taxes | 1,261 | 1,522 | ||||
Interest paid | (23 | ) | (22 | ) | ||
Income taxes paid1 | (234 | ) | (198 | ) | ||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 1,004 | 1,302 | ||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment | ||||||
Capital expenditures (note 5) | (611 | ) | (539 | ) | ||
Sales proceeds | 1 | 4 | ||||
Investment sales | 260 | — | ||||
Dividends received from equity method investments (note 12) | 359 | 126 | ||||
Shareholder loan repayments from equity method investments (note 12) | — | 1 | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 9 | (408 | ) | |||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||||
Lease repayments | (6 | ) | (6 | ) | ||
Debt repayments | — | (7 | ) | |||
Dividends | (178 | ) | (158 | ) | ||
Funding from non-controlling interests (note 16) | — | 6 | ||||
Disbursements to non-controlling interests (note 16) | (267 | ) | (265 | ) | ||
Pueblo Viejo JV partner shareholder loan | 45 | 21 | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities | (406 | ) | (409 | ) | ||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents | — | (1 | ) | |||
Net increase in cash and equivalents | 607 | 484 | ||||
Cash and equivalents at the beginning of period | 5,280 | 5,188 | ||||
Cash and equivalents at the end of period | $5,887 | $5,672 |
1. Income taxes paid excludes $26 million (2021: $36 million) of income taxes payable that were settled against offsetting VAT receivables.
The notes to these unaudited condensed interim financial statements, which are contained in the First Quarter Report 2022 available on our website, are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Barrick Gold Corporation | As at March 31, | As at December 31, | ||||
(in millions of United States dollars) (Unaudited) | 2022 | 2021 | ||||
ASSETS | ||||||
Current assets | ||||||
Cash and equivalents | $5,887 | $5,280 | ||||
Accounts receivable | 640 | 623 | ||||
Inventories | 1,766 | 1,734 | ||||
Other current assets | 722 | 612 | ||||
Total current assets | $9,015 | $8,249 | ||||
Non-current assets | ||||||
Equity in investees (note 12) | 4,334 | 4,594 | ||||
Property, plant and equipment | 25,153 | 24,954 | ||||
Goodwill | 4,769 | 4,769 | ||||
Intangible assets | 149 | 150 | ||||
Deferred income tax assets | 15 | 29 | ||||
Non-current portion of inventory | 2,639 | 2,636 | ||||
Other assets | 1,232 | 1,509 | ||||
Total assets | $47,306 | $46,890 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | ||||||
Current liabilities | ||||||
Accounts payable | $1,525 | $1,448 | ||||
Debt | 14 | 15 | ||||
Current income tax liabilities | 342 | 285 | ||||
Other current liabilities | 366 | 338 | ||||
Total current liabilities | $2,247 | $2,086 | ||||
Non-current liabilities | ||||||
Debt | 5,130 | 5,135 | ||||
Provisions | 2,738 | 2,768 | ||||
Deferred income tax liabilities | 3,308 | 3,293 | ||||
Other liabilities | 1,257 | 1,301 | ||||
Total liabilities | $14,680 | $14,583 | ||||
Equity | ||||||
Capital stock (note 15) | $28,497 | $28,497 | ||||
Deficit | (6,306 | ) | (6,566 | ) | ||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | 35 | (23 | ) | |||
Other | 1,949 | 1,949 | ||||
Total equity attributable to Barrick Gold Corporation shareholders | $24,175 | $23,857 | ||||
Non-controlling interests (note 16) | 8,451 | 8,450 | ||||
Total equity | $32,626 | $32,307 | ||||
Contingencies and commitments (notes 5 and 17) | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity | $47,306 | $46,890 |
The notes to these unaudited condensed interim financial statements, which are contained in the First Quarter Report 2022 available on our website, are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
Barrick Gold Corporation | Attributable to equity holders of the company | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(in millions of United States dollars) (Unaudited) | Common Shares (in thousands) | Capital stock | Retained earnings (deficit) | Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)1 | Other2 | Total equity attributable to shareholders | Non-controlling interests | Total equity | |||||||||||||||
At January 1, 2022 | 1,779,331 | $28,497 | ($6,566 | ) | ($23 | ) | $1,949 | $23,857 | $8,450 | $32,307 | |||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | 438 | — | — | 438 | 268 | 706 | |||||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income (loss) | — | — | — | 58 | — | 58 | — | 58 | |||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | — | — | 438 | 58 | — | 496 | 268 | 764 | |||||||||||||||
Transactions with owners | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends | — | — | (178 | ) | — | — | (178 | ) | — | (178 | ) | ||||||||||||
Disbursements to non-controlling interests (note 16) | — | — | — | — | — | — | (267 | ) | (267 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividend reinvestment plan (note 15) | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Total transactions with owners | 25 | — | (178 | ) | — | — | (178 | ) | (267 | ) | (445 | ) | |||||||||||
At March 31, 2022 | 1,779,356 | $28,497 | ($6,306 | ) | $35 | $1,949 | $24,175 | $8,451 | $32,626 | ||||||||||||||
At January 1, 2021 | 1,778,190 | $29,236 | ($7,949 | ) | $14 | $2,040 | $23,341 | $8,369 | $31,710 | ||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | 538 | — | — | 538 | 292 | 830 | |||||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income (loss) | — | — | — | (47 | ) | — | (47 | ) | — | (47 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) | — | — | 538 | (47 | ) | — | 491 | 292 | 783 | ||||||||||||||
Transactions with owners | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends | — | — | (158 | ) | — | — | (158 | ) | — | (158 | ) | ||||||||||||
Issued on exercise of stock options | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Funding from non-controlling interests | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||||
Disbursements to non-controlling interests | — | — | — | — | — | — | (262 | ) | (262 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividend reinvestment plan | 72 | 2 | (2 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Share-based payments | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Total transactions with owners | 181 | 2 | (160 | ) | — | — | (158 | ) | (256 | ) | (414 | ) | |||||||||||
At March 31, 2021 | 1,778,371 | $29,238 | ($7,571 | ) | ($33 | ) | $2,040 | $23,674 | $8,405 | $32,079 |
1. Includes cumulative translation losses at March 31, 2022: $94 million (December 31, 2021: $94 million; March 31, 2021: $95 million).
2. Includes additional paid-in capital as at March 31, 2022: $1,911 million (December 31, 2021: $1,911 million; March 31, 2021: $2,002 million).
The notes to these unaudited condensed interim financial statements, which are contained in the First Quarter Report 2022 available on our website, are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
Technical Information
The scientific and technical information contained in this press release has been reviewed and approved by Craig Fiddes, SME-RM, Manager – Resource Modeling, Nevada Gold Mines; Chad Yuhasz, P.Geo, Mineral Resource Manager, Latin America & Asia Pacific; Simon Bottoms, CGeol, MGeol, FGS, FAusIMM, Mineral Resources Manager: Africa & Middle East; Rodney Quick, MSc, Pr. Sci.Nat, Mineral Resource Management and Evaluation Executive; John Steele, CIM, Metallurgy, Engineering and Capital Projects Executive; and Rob Krcmarov, FAusIMM, Technical Advisor to Barrick — each a “Qualified Person” as defined in National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.
All mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates are estimated in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. Unless otherwise noted, such mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates are as of December 31, 2021.
Endnotes
Endnote 1
“Free cash flow” is a non-GAAP financial performance measure that deducts capital expenditures from net cash provided by operating activities. Management believes this to be a useful indicator of our ability to operate without reliance on additional borrowing or usage of existing cash. Free cash flow is intended to provide additional information only and does not have any standardized definition under IFRS, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Other companies may calculate this measure differently. Further details on this non-GAAP financial performance measure are provided in the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s financial statements filed from time to time on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Reconciliation of Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities to Free Cash Flow
($ millions) | For the three months ended | |||||
3/31/22 | 12/31/21 | 3/31/21 | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 1,004 | 1,387 | 1,302 | |||
Capital expenditures | (611 | ) | (669 | ) | (539 | ) |
Free cash flow | 393 | 718 | 763 |
Endnote 2
Calculated as cash and equivalents ($5,887 million) less debt ($5,144 million).
Endnote 3
“Adjusted net earnings” and “adjusted net earnings per share” are non-GAAP financial performance measures. Adjusted net earnings excludes the following from net earnings: certain impairment charges (reversals) related to intangibles, goodwill, property, plant and equipment, and investments; gains (losses) and other one time costs relating to acquisitions or dispositions; foreign currency translation gains (losses); significant tax adjustments not related to current period earnings; and the tax effect and non-controlling interest of these items. Management uses this measure internally to evaluate our underlying operating performance for the reporting periods presented and to assist with the planning and forecasting of future operating results. Management believes that adjusted net earnings is a useful measure of our performance because these adjusting items do not reflect the underlying operating performance of our core mining business and are not necessarily indicative of future operating results. Adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standardized definition under IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Other companies may calculate these measures differently. Further details on these non-GAAP financial performance measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s financial statements filed from time to time on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Reconciliation of Net Earnings to Net Earnings per Share, Adjusted Net Earnings and Adjusted Net Earnings per Share
($ millions, except per share amounts in dollars) | For the three months ended | |||||
3/31/22 | 12/31/21 | 3/31/21 | ||||
Net earnings attributable to equity holders of the Company | 438 | 726 | 538 | |||
Impairment charges (reversals) related to intangibles, goodwill, property, plant and equipment, and investmentsa | 2 | 14 | (89 | ) | ||
Acquisition/disposition (gains) lossesb | (2 | ) | (198 | ) | (3 | ) |
Loss on currency translation | 3 | 13 | 4 | |||
Significant tax adjustmentsc | 17 | (29 | ) | 47 | ||
Other expense adjustmentsd | 13 | 36 | 11 | |||
Tax effect and non-controlling intereste | (8 | ) | 64 | (1 | ) | |
Adjusted net earnings | 463 | 626 | 507 | |||
Net earnings per sharef | 0.25 | 0.41 | 0.30 | |||
Adjusted net earnings per sharef | 0.26 | 0.35 | 0.29 |
Endnote 4
“Realized price” is a non-GAAP financial performance measure which excludes from sales: unrealized gains and losses on non-hedge derivative contracts; unrealized mark-to-market gains and losses on provisional pricing from copper and gold sales contracts; sales attributable to ore purchase arrangements; treatment and refining charges; and cumulative catch-up adjustments to revenue relating to our streaming arrangements. This measure is intended to enable Management to better understand the price realized in each reporting period for gold and copper sales because unrealized mark-to-market values of non-hedge gold and copper derivatives are subject to change each period due to changes in market factors such as market and forward gold and copper prices, so that prices ultimately realized may differ from those recorded. The exclusion of such unrealized mark-to-market gains and losses from the presentation of this performance measure enables investors to understand performance based on the realized proceeds of selling gold and copper production. The realized price measure is intended to provide additional information and does not have any standardized definition under IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Other companies may calculate this measure differently. Further details on these non-GAAP financial performance measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s financial statements filed from time to time on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Reconciliation of Sales to Realized Price per ounce/pound
($ millions, except per ounce/pound information in dollars) | Gold | Copper | |||||||
For the three months ended | |||||||||
3/31/22 | 12/31/21 | 3/31/21 | 3/31/22 | 12/31/21 | 3/31/21 | ||||
Sales | 2,511 | 2,977 | 2,641 | 287 | 263 | 256 | |||
Sales applicable to non-controlling interests | (787 | ) | (931 | ) | (814 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Sales applicable to equity method investmentsa,b | 136 | 172 | 154 | 188 | 222 | 170 | |||
Sales applicable to sites in closure or care and maintenancec | 0 | (8 | ) | (41 | ) | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Treatment and refinement charges | 3 | 1 | 0 | 51 | 39 | 41 | |||
Otherd | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Revenues – as adjusted | 1,863 | 2,213 | 1,940 | 526 | 524 | 467 | |||
Ounces/pounds sold (000s ounces/millions pounds)c | 993 | 1,234 | 1,093 | 113 | 113 | 113 | |||
Realized gold/copper price per ounce/pounde | 1,876 | 1,793 | 1,777 | 4.68 | 4.63 | 4.12 |
Endnote 5
Capital expenditures are classified into minesite sustaining capital expenditures or project capital expenditures depending on the nature of the expenditure. Minesite sustaining capital expenditures is the capital spending required to support current production levels. Project capital expenditures represent the capital spending at new projects and major, discrete projects at existing operations intended to increase net present value through higher production or longer mine life. Management believes this to be a useful indicator of the purpose of capital expenditures and this distinction is an input into the calculation of all-in sustaining costs per ounce and all-in costs per ounce. Classifying capital expenditures is intended to provide additional information only and does not have any standardized definition under IFRS, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Other companies may calculate these measures differently. The following table reconciles these non-GAAP financial performance measures to the most directly comparable IFRS measure.
Reconciliation of the Classification of Capital Expenditures
For the three months ended | |||
($ millions) | 3/31/22 | 12/31/21 | 3/31/2021 |
Minesite sustaining capital expenditures | 420 | 431 | 405 |
Project capital expenditures | 186 | 234 | 131 |
Capitalized interest | 5 | 4 | 3 |
Total consolidated capital expenditures | 611 | 669 | 539 |
Endnote 6
Attributable capital expenditures are presented on the same basis as guidance, which includes our 61.5% share of Nevada Gold Mines, our 60% share of Pueblo Viejo, our 80% share of Loulo-Gounkoto, our 89.7% share of Tongon, our 84% share of North Mara and Bulyanhulu and our 50% share of Zaldívar and Jabal Sayid.
Endnote 7
On an attributable basis.
Endnote 8
Gold cost of sales per ounce is calculated as cost of sales across our gold operations (excluding sites in closure or care and maintenance) divided by ounces sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share). Copper cost of sales per pound is calculated as cost of sales across our copper operations divided by pounds sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick’s ownership share).
Endnote 9
“Total cash costs” per ounce, “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce and “All-in costs” per ounce are non-GAAP financial performance measures. “Total cash costs” per ounce starts with cost of sales related to gold production and removes depreciation, the non-controlling interest of cost of sales, and includes by-product credits. “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce start with “Total cash costs” per ounce and includes minesite sustaining capital expenditures, sustaining leases, general and administrative costs, minesite exploration and evaluation costs, and reclamation cost accretion and amortization. These additional costs reflect the expenditures made to maintain current production levels. "All in costs" per ounce starts with "All-in sustaining costs" per ounce and adds additional costs that reflect the varying costs of producing gold over the life-cycle of a mine, including: project capital expenditures and other non-sustaining costs. Barrick believes that the use of “Total cash costs” per ounce, “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce and "All-in costs" per ounce will assist investors, analysts and other stakeholders of Barrick in understanding the costs associated with producing gold, understanding the economics of gold mining, assessing our operating performance and also our ability to generate free cash flow from current operations and to generate free cash flow on an overall company basis. “Total cash costs” per ounce, “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce and "All-in costs" per ounce are intended to provide additional information only and do not have standardized definitions under IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Although a standardized definition of all-in sustaining costs was published by the World Gold Council (a market development organization for the gold industry comprised of and funded by gold mining companies from around the world, including Barrick), it is not a regulatory organization, and other companies may calculate this measure differently. Further details on these non-GAAP financial performance measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s financial statements filed from time to time on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Reconciliation of Gold Cost of Sales to Total cash costs, All-in sustaining costs and All-in costs, including on a per ounce basis
($ millions, except per ounce information in dollars) | For the three months ended | ||||||
Footnote | 3/31/22 | 12/31/21 | 3/31/21 | ||||
Cost of sales applicable to gold production | 1,582 | 1,771 | 1,571 | ||||
Depreciation | (419 | ) | (512 | ) | (454 | ) | |
Cash cost of sales applicable to equity method investments | 51 | 52 | 59 | ||||
By-product credits | (55 | ) | (70 | ) | (59 | ) | |
Realized (gains) losses on hedge and non-hedge derivatives | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Non-recurring items | a | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Other | b | (1 | ) | (7 | ) | (33 | ) |
Non-controlling interests | c | (331 | ) | (351 | ) | (302 | ) |
Total cash costs | 827 | 883 | 782 | ||||
General & administrative costs | 54 | 39 | 38 | ||||
Minesite exploration and evaluation costs | d | 10 | 12 | 16 | |||
Minesite sustaining capital expenditures | e | 420 | 431 | 405 | |||
Sustaining leases | 9 | 13 | 13 | ||||
Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (operating sites) | f | 11 | 12 | 11 | |||
Non-controlling interest, copper operations and other | g | (176 | ) | (191 | ) | (154 | ) |
All-in sustaining costs | 1,155 | 1,199 | 1,111 | ||||
Global exploration and evaluation and project expense | d | 57 | 70 | 45 | |||
Community relations costs not related to current operations | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Project capital expenditures | e | 186 | 234 | 131 | |||
Non-sustaining leases | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (non-operating sites) | f | 3 | 2 | 3 | |||
Non-controlling interest and copper operations and other | g | (58 | ) | (71 | ) | (42 | ) |
All-in costs | 1,343 | 1,434 | 1,248 | ||||
Ounces sold - equity basis (000s ounces) | h | 993 | 1,234 | 1,093 | |||
Cost of sales per ounce | i,j | 1,190 | 1,075 | 1,073 | |||
Total cash costs per ounce | j | 832 | 715 | 716 | |||
Total cash costs per ounce (on a co-product basis) | j,k | 869 | 753 | 746 | |||
All-in sustaining costs per ounce | j | 1,164 | 971 | 1,018 | |||
All-in sustaining costs per ounce (on a co-product basis) | j,k | 1,201 | 1,009 | 1,048 | |||
All-in costs per ounce | j | 1,353 | 1,162 | 1,144 | |||
All-in costs per ounce (on a co-product basis) | j,k | 1,390 | 1,200 | 1,174 |
a. | Non-recurring items These costs are not indicative of our cost of production and have been excluded from the calculation of total cash costs. |
b. | Other Other adjustments for the three month period ended March 31, 2022 include the removal of total cash costs and by-product credits associated with Pierina, Golden Sunlight, Lagunas Norte up until its divestiture in June 2021, and Buzwagi starting the fourth quarter of 2021, which all are producing incidental ounces, of $3 million (December 31, 2021: $7 million; March 31, 2021: $24 million). |
c. | Non-controlling interests Non-controlling interests include non-controlling interests related to gold production of $476 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2022 (December 31, 2021: $527 million and March 31, 2021: $462 million). Non-controlling interests include Nevada Gold Mines, Pueblo Viejo, Loulo-Gounkoto, Tongon, North Mara, Bulyanhulu, and Buzwagi up until the third quarter of 2021. Refer to Note 5 to the Financial Statements for further information. |
d. | Exploration and evaluation costs Exploration, evaluation and project expenses are presented as minesite sustaining if it supports current mine operations and project if it relates to future projects. Refer to page 70 of the Q1 2022 MD&A. |
e. | Capital expenditures Capital expenditures are related to our gold sites only and are split between minesite sustaining and project capital expenditures. Project capital expenditures are capital spending at new projects and major, distinct projects at existing operations intended to increase net present value through higher production or longer mine life. Significant projects in the current year are the expansion project at Pueblo Viejo, construction of the Third Shaft at Turquoise Ridge, and the Veladero Phase 7 expansion. Refer to page 69 of the Q1 2022 MD&A. |
f. | Rehabilitation—accretion and amortization Includes depreciation on the assets related to rehabilitation provisions of our gold operations and accretion on the rehabilitation provision of our gold operations, split between operating and non-operating sites. |
g. | Non-controlling interest and copper operations Removes general & administrative costs related to non-controlling interests and copper based on a percentage allocation of revenue. Also removes exploration, evaluation and project expenses, rehabilitation costs and capital expenditures incurred by our copper sites and the non-controlling interest of Nevada Gold Mines (including South Arturo), Pueblo Viejo, Loulo-Gounkoto, Tongon, North Mara, Bulyanhulu, and Buzwagi (up until the third quarter of 2021) operating segments. It also includes capital expenditures applicable to our equity method investment in Kibali. Figures remove the impact of Pierina, Golden Sunlight, Lagunas Norte up until its divestiture in June 2021, and Buzwagi starting the fourth quarter of 2021. The impact is summarized as the following: |
($ millions) | For the three months ended | |||||
Non-controlling interest, copper operations and other | 3/31/22 | 12/31/21 | 3/31/21 | |||
General & administrative costs | (13 | ) | (4 | ) | (6 | ) |
Minesite exploration and evaluation expenses | (3 | ) | (2 | ) | (7 | ) |
Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization (operating sites) | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | (3 | ) |
Minesite sustaining capital expenditures | (157 | ) | (182 | ) | (138 | ) |
All-in sustaining costs total | (176 | ) | (191 | ) | (154 | ) |
Global exploration and evaluation and project expense | (4 | ) | (6 | ) | (1 | ) |
Project capital expenditures | (54 | ) | (65 | ) | (41 | ) |
All-in costs total | (58 | ) | (71 | ) | (42 | ) |
h. | Ounces sold - equity basis Figures remove the impact of: Pierina, Golden Sunlight, Lagunas Norte up until its divestiture in June 2021, and Buzwagi starting the fourth quarter of 2021. Some of these assets are producing incidental ounces while in closure or care and maintenance. |
i. | Cost of sales per ounce Figures remove the cost of sales impact of: Pierina of $3 million for the three month period ended March 31, 2022 (December 31, 2021: $7 million and March 31, 2021: $5 million); Golden Sunlight of $nil for the three month period ended March 31, 2022 (December 31, 2021: $nil and March 31, 2021: $nil); up until its divestiture in June 2021, Lagunas Norte of $nil for the three month period ended March 31, 2022 (December 31, 2021: $nil and March 31, 2021: $23 million); and starting the fourth quarter of 2021, Buzwagi of $nil for the three month period ended March 31, 2022 (December 31, 2021: $nil and March 31, 2021: $nil), which are producing incidental ounces. Gold cost of sales per ounce is calculated as cost of sales across our gold operations (excluding sites in closure or care and maintenance) divided by ounces sold (both on an attributable basis using Barrick's ownership share). |
j. | Per ounce figures Cost of sales per ounce, total cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce and all-in costs per ounce may not calculate based on amounts presented in this table due to rounding. |
k. | Co-product costs per ounce Total cash costs per ounce, all-in sustaining costs per ounce and all-in costs per ounce presented on a co-product basis removes the impact of by-product credits of our gold production (net of non-controlling interest) calculated as: |
($ millions) | For the three months ended | |||||
3/31/22 | 12/31/21 | 3/31/21 | ||||
By-product credits | 55 | 70 | 59 | |||
Non-controlling interest | (19 | ) | (25 | ) | (26 | ) |
By-product credits (net of non-controlling interest) | 36 | 45 | 33 |
Endnote 10
“C1 cash costs” per pound and “All-in sustaining costs” per pound are non-GAAP financial performance measures. “C1 cash costs” per pound is based on cost of sales but excludes the impact of depreciation and royalties and production taxes and includes treatment and refinement charges. “All-in sustaining costs” per pound begins with “C1 cash costs” per pound and adds further costs which reflect the additional costs of operating a mine, primarily sustaining capital expenditures, sustaining leases, general and administrative costs, minesite exploration and evaluation costs, royalties and production taxes, reclamation cost accretion and amortization and write-downs taken on inventory to net realizable value. Management believes that the use of “C1 cash costs” per pound and “all-in sustaining costs” per pound will enable investors to better understand the operating performance of our copper mines as this measure reflects all of the sustaining expenditures incurred in order to produce copper. “C1 cash costs” per pound and “All-in sustaining costs” per pound are intended to provide additional information only and do not have standardized definitions under IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Other companies may calculate these measures differently. Further details on these non-GAAP financial performance measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s financial statements filed from time to time on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Reconciliation of Copper Cost of Sales to C1 cash costs and All-in sustaining costs, including on a per pound basis
($ millions, except per pound information in dollars) | For the three months ended | |||||
3/31/22 | 12/31/21 | 3/31/21 | ||||
Cost of sales | 154 | 134 | 136 | |||
Depreciation/amortization | (38 | ) | (43 | ) | (48 | ) |
Treatment and refinement charges | 51 | 39 | 41 | |||
Cash cost of sales applicable to equity method investments | 72 | 88 | 79 | |||
Less: royalties and production taxesa | (32 | ) | (28 | ) | (23 | ) |
By-product credits | (3 | ) | (6 | ) | (4 | ) |
Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
C1 cash costs | 204 | 184 | 181 | |||
General & administrative costs | 12 | 5 | 4 | |||
Rehabilitation - accretion and amortization | 1 | 2 | 1 | |||
Royalties and production taxesa | 32 | 28 | 23 | |||
Minesite exploration and evaluation costs | 3 | 5 | 2 | |||
Minesite sustaining capital expenditures | 67 | 104 | 42 | |||
Sustaining leases | 1 | 3 | 2 | |||
All-in sustaining costs | 320 | 331 | 255 | |||
Pounds sold - consolidated basis (millions pounds) | 113 | 113 | 113 | |||
Cost of sales per poundb,c | 2.21 | 2.21 | 2.11 | |||
C1 cash cost per poundb | 1.81 | 1.63 | 1.60 | |||
All-in sustaining costs per poundb | 2.85 | 2.92 | 2.26 |
Endnote 11
A Tier One Gold Asset is an asset with a reserve potential to deliver a minimum 10-year life, annual production of at least 500,000 ounces of gold and total cash costs per ounce over the mine life that are in the lower half of the industry cost curve. A Tier One Copper Asset is an asset with a reserve potential of greater than five million tonnes of contained copper and C1 cash costs per pound over the mine life that are in the lower half of the industry cost curve.
Endnote 12
Lost time injury frequency rate (“LTIFR”) is a ratio calculated as follows: number of lost time injuries x 1,000,000 hours divided by the total number of hours worked.
Endnote 13
On a 100% basis. See the Technical Report on the Pueblo Viejo mine, Sanchez Ramirez Province, Dominican Republic, dated March 19, 2018, and filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov on March 23, 2018.
Endnote 14
The declaration and payment of dividends is at the discretion of the Board of Directors, and will depend on the Company’s financial results, cash requirements, future prospects, the number of outstanding common shares, and other factors deemed relevant by the Board.
Endnote 15
Historical estimate as of December 31, 2010 on a 100% basis. Probable reserves of 74 million tonnes grading 4.21g/t, representing 10 million ounces of gold. Historical reserves were estimated by Randgold Resources in accordance with the Australian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (the “JORC Code”). The JORC Code reporting standards are functionally equivalent to National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects.
Endnote 16
Estimated in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects as required by Canadian securities regulatory authorities. Estimates are as of December 31, 2021 on a 100% basis. Proven reserves of 32 million tonnes grading 3.76g/t, representing 3.9 million ounces of gold; probable reserves of 51 million tonnes grading 3.50g/t, representing 5.8 million ounces of gold. Complete mineral reserve and mineral resource data for all of Barrick’s mines and projects, including tonnes, grades, and ounces, can be found on pages 34-47 of Barrick’s 2021 Annual Information Form / Form 40-F on file with the Canadian provincial securities regulators on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and the Securities and Exchange Commission on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Endnote 17
Total reportable incident frequency rate ("TRIFR") is a ratio calculated as follows: number of reportable injuries x 1,000,000 hours divided by the total number of hours worked. Reportable injuries include fatalities, lost time injuries, restricted duty injuries, and medically treated injuries.
Endnote 18
Future economic contribution over extended mine life assuming a gold price of $1,599 per ounce and a silver price of $20.96 per ounce.
Endnote 19
As of December 31, 2021.
Endnote 20
The actual number of common shares that may be purchased, if any, and the timing of any such purchases, will be determined by Barrick based on a number of factors, including the company’s financial performance, the availability of cash flows, and the consideration of other uses of cash, including capital investment opportunities, returns to shareholders, and debt reduction.
Endnote 21
Included within our 61.5% interest in Carlin is Nevada Gold Mines' 100% interest in South Arturo.
Endnote 22
Includes Goldrush.
Endnote 23
Porgera was placed on temporary care and maintenance in April 2020 and remains excluded from our 2022 guidance. We expect to update our guidance to include Porgera following both the execution of definitive agreements to implement the Commencement Agreement and the finalization of a timeline for the resumption of full mine operations. Refer to page 31 of Barrick’s Q1 2022 MD&A for further details.
Endnote 24
Total cash costs and all-in sustaining costs per ounce include costs allocated to non-operating sites.
Endnote 25
Operating division guidance ranges reflect expectations at each individual operating division, and may not add up to the company-wide guidance range total. Guidance ranges exclude Pierina, Golden Sunlight and Buzwagi. Some of these assets are producing incidental ounces while in closure or care and maintenance.
Endnote 26
Includes corporate administration costs.
Endnote 27
EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial performance measure, which excludes the following from net earnings: income tax expense; finance costs; finance income; and depreciation. Management believes that EBITDA is a valuable indicator of our ability to generate liquidity by producing operating cash flow to fund working capital needs, service debt obligations, and fund capital expenditures. Management uses EBITDA for this purpose. Adjusted EBITDA removes the effect of impairment charges; acquisition/disposition gains/losses; foreign currency translation gains/losses; and other expense adjustments. We also remove the impact of the income tax expense, finance costs, finance income and depreciation incurred in our equity method accounted investments. We believe these items provide a greater level of consistency with the adjusting items included in our adjusted net earnings reconciliation, with the exception that these amounts are adjusted to remove any impact on finance costs/income, income tax expense and/or depreciation as they do not affect EBITDA. We believe this additional information will assist analysts, investors and other stakeholders of Barrick in better understanding our ability to generate liquidity from our full business, including equity method investments, by excluding these amounts from the calculation as they are not indicative of the performance of our core mining business and not necessarily reflective of the underlying operating results for the periods presented. EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standardized definition under IFRS and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Other companies may calculate EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA differently. Further details on these non-GAAP financial performance measures are provided in the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s financial statements filed from time to time on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
Reconciliation of Net Earnings to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA
($ millions) | For the three months ended | |||||
3/31/22 | 12/31/21 | 3/31/21 | ||||
Net earnings | 706 | 1,152 | 830 | |||
Income tax expense | 301 | 304 | 374 | |||
Finance costs, neta | 76 | 74 | 77 | |||
Depreciation | 460 | 557 | 507 | |||
EBITDA | 1,543 | 2,087 | 1,788 | |||
Impairment charges (reversals) of long-lived assetsb | 2 | 14 | (89 | ) | ||
Acquisition/disposition (gains) lossesc | (2 | ) | (198 | ) | (3 | ) |
Loss on currency translation | 3 | 13 | 4 | |||
Other expense adjustmentsd | 13 | 36 | 11 | |||
Income tax expense, net finance costs, and depreciation from equity investees | 86 | 118 | 89 | |||
Adjusted EBITDA | 1,645 | 2,070 | 1,800 |
Corporate Office
Barrick Gold Corporation
161 Bay Street, Suite 3700
Toronto, Ontario M5J 2S1
Canada
Telephone: +1 416 861-9911
Email: investor@barrick.com
Website: www.barrick.com
Shares Listed
GOLD
The New York Stock Exchange
ABX
The Toronto Stock Exchange
Transfer Agents and Registrars
TSX Trust Company
P.O. Box 700, Postal Station B
Montreal, Quebec H3B 3K3
or
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC
6201 – 15 Avenue
Brooklyn, New York 11219
Telephone: 1-800-387-0825
Fax: 1-888-249-6189
Email: inquiries@astfinancial.com
Website: www.astfinancial.com
Enquiries
President and Chief Executive Officer
Mark Bristow
+1 647 205 7694
+44 788 071 1386
Senior Executive Vice-President and
Chief Financial Officer
Graham Shuttleworth
+1 647 262 2095
+44 779 771 1338
Investor and Media Relations
Kathy du Plessis
+44 20 7557 7738
Email: barrick@dpapr.com
Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Information
Certain information contained or incorporated by reference in this press release, including any information as to our strategy, projects, plans or future financial or operating performance, constitutes “forward-looking statements”. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. The words “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “contemplate”, “goal”, “target”, “plan”, “strategy”, “opportunities”, “guidance”, “outlook”, “project”, “continue”, “committed”, “budget”, “estimate”, “forecast”, “potential”, “proposed”, “future”, “prospective”, “focus”, “during”, “ongoing”, “following”, “subject to”, “scheduled”, “will”, “could”, “would”, “should” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. In particular, this press release contains forward-looking statements including, without limitation, with respect to: Barrick’s forward-looking production guidance; estimates of future cost of sales per ounce for gold and per pound for copper, total cash costs per ounce and C1 cash costs per pound, and all-in-sustaining costs per ounce/pound; projected capital, operating and exploration expenditures; our ability to convert resources into reserves and replace reserves net of depletion from production; mine life and production rates; Barrick’s global exploration strategy and planned exploration activities, including in new prospective territories in the Asia Pacific region, North Africa and the Middle East, Latin America and Canada; the timeline and process for the execution and legalization of definitive agreements and the reconstitution of a joint venture to carry out the future development and operation of the Reko Diq project; the planned updating of the historical Reko Diq feasibility study and our plans upon the project’s reconstitution; the proposed fiscal and governance terms applicable to the Reko Diq project and the joint venture through which it is held; the duration of the temporary suspension of operations at Porgera, the conditions for the reopening of the mine and the timeline to recommence operations; our plans and expected completion and benefits of our growth projects, including the Pueblo Viejo plant expansion and mine life extension project; Barrick’s strategy, plans, targets and goals in respect of environmental and social governance issues, including local community relations, climate change, greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets (including with respect to our Scope 3 emissions), tailings storage facility management (including the new Tailings Storage Facility at Pueblo Viejo) and biodiversity initiatives in our local communities; plans to repurchase Barrick shares pursuant to the share buyback program, which does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular number of common shares and which may be suspended or discontinued at any time at the Company’s discretion; Barrick’s performance dividend policy; and expectations regarding future price assumptions, financial performance and other outlook or guidance.
Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions including material estimates and assumptions related to the factors set forth below that, while considered reasonable by the Company as at the date of this press release in light of management’s experience and perception of current conditions and expected developments, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Known and unknown factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements and information. Such factors include, but are not limited to: fluctuations in the spot and forward price of gold, copper or certain other commodities (such as silver, diesel fuel, natural gas and electricity); risks associated with projects in the early stages of evaluation and for which additional engineering and other analysis is required; risks related to the possibility that future exploration results will not be consistent with the Company’s expectations, that quantities or grades of reserves will be diminished, and that resources may not be converted to reserves; risks associated with the fact that certain of the initiatives described in this press release are still in the early stages and may not materialize; changes in mineral production performance, exploitation and exploration successes; risks that exploration data may be incomplete and considerable additional work may be required to complete further evaluation, including but not limited to drilling, engineering and socioeconomic studies and investment; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development; lack of certainty with respect to foreign legal systems, corruption and other factors that are inconsistent with the rule of law; changes in national and local government legislation, taxation, controls or regulations and/or changes in the administration of laws, policies and practices; expropriation or nationalization of property and political or economic developments in Canada, the United States or other countries in which Barrick does or may carry on business in the future; risks relating to political instability in certain of the jurisdictions in which Barrick operates; timing of receipt of, or failure to comply with, necessary permits and approvals; non-renewal of or failure to obtain key licenses by governmental authorities, including the mining lease and exploration license for the Reko Diq project; failure to comply with environmental and health and safety laws and regulations; contests over title to properties, particularly title to undeveloped properties, or over access to water, power and other required infrastructure; the liability associated with risks and hazards in the mining industry, and the ability to maintain insurance to cover such losses; increased costs and physical risks, including extreme weather events and resource shortages, related to climate change; damage to the Company’s reputation due to the actual or perceived occurrence of any number of events, including negative publicity with respect to the Company’s handling of environmental matters or dealings with community groups, whether true or not; risks related to operations near communities that may regard Barrick’s operations as being detrimental to them; litigation and legal and administrative proceedings; operating or technical difficulties in connection with mining or development activities, including geotechnical challenges, tailings dam and storage facilities failures, and disruptions in the maintenance or provision of required infrastructure and information technology systems; increased costs, delays, suspensions and technical challenges associated with the construction of capital projects; risks associated with working with partners in jointly controlled assets; risks related to disruption of supply routes which may cause delays in construction and mining activities; risk of loss due to acts of war, terrorism, sabotage and civil disturbances; risks associated with artisanal and illegal mining; risks associated with Barrick’s infrastructure, information technology systems and the implementation of Barrick’s technological initiatives; the impact of global liquidity and credit availability on the timing of cash flows and the values of assets and liabilities based on projected future cash flows; the impact of inflation, including global inflationary pressures driven by supply chain disruptions caused by the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic and global energy cost increases following the invasion of Ukraine by Russia; adverse changes in our credit ratings; fluctuations in the currency markets; changes in U.S. dollar interest rates; risks arising from holding derivative instruments (such as credit risk, market liquidity risk and mark-to-market risk); risks related to the demands placed on the Company’s management, the ability of management to implement its business strategy and enhanced political risk in certain jurisdictions; uncertainty whether some or all of Barrick’s targeted investments and projects will meet the Company’s capital allocation objectives and internal hurdle rate; whether benefits expected from recent transactions being realized; business opportunities that may be presented to, or pursued by, the Company; our ability to successfully integrate acquisitions or complete divestitures; risks related to competition in the mining industry; employee relations including loss of key employees; availability and increased costs associated with mining inputs and labor; risks associated with diseases, epidemics and pandemics, including the effects and potential effects of the global Covid-19 pandemic; risks related to the failure of internal controls; and risks related to the impairment of the Company’s goodwill and assets. Barrick also cautions that its 2022 guidance may be impacted by the unprecedented business and social disruption caused by the spread of Covid-19. In addition, there are risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and gold bullion, copper cathode or gold or copper concentrate losses (and the risk of inadequate insurance, or inability to obtain insurance, to cover these risks).
Many of these uncertainties and contingencies can affect our actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, us. Readers are cautioned that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. All of the forward-looking statements made in this press release are qualified by these cautionary statements. Specific reference is made to the most recent Form 40-F/Annual Information Form on file with the SEC and Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities for a more detailed discussion of some of the factors underlying forward-looking statements and the risks that may affect Barrick’s ability to achieve the expectations set forth in the forward-looking statements contained in this press release. We disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.