T/I 10:47:05A lawyer acting for Yigal Amir, the Jewish extremist convicted ofthe assassination of Yitzhak Rabin, said on Sunday (7/7) that Amircould not have killed the Israeli prime minister.SHOWS:ISRAEL, JERUSALEM, 7/7Yigal Amir's lawyer Jonathan Goldberg ENG SOT:The prime ministerand the bodyguard were on the ground. Yigal Amir shot a straightangle. There was no way he could shoot the Prime Minister (PM).Even the order of the bullets and the number was different. Thereshould have been five bullets left. According to the evidence alot more than that. There is a lot of controversy over theevidence and what exactly happened. Other things show thataccording to three doctors, when the PM first came in they saidthat the person that really shot Rabin shot four or five minutesbeforehand. He got to the hospital at 9:52, four or five minutesbefore that, that's 9:47 or 48. They were already in the car,gone. There was no way that Amir shot the PM. It's true that heshot him but they were blank bullets. And he was the camouflagefor the real murderer. .. That's what I'm saying.. We are sayingthat the real murderer could have been.. the PM was killed on theway to the hospital because even the bodyguard.. said "drive"..only afterwards he says "drive to the hospital." He did not say"drive to the hospital" at the very beginning. Only afterwards. Bythe way, he said it only took a minute and a half to get to thehospital. That's a lie. It took him twenty two minutes to get tothe hospital. What happened in those twenty two minutes? In aminute and a half you can get to the hospital by walking... Ithink that supports what I am saying: that Amir wants to takeresponsibility for everything. He wants to be the one that did itand that's why he wants to take claim for that. He is taking claimfor something that someone else was doing.2.13You can license this story through AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/metadata/you... Find out more about AP Archive: http://www.aparchive.com/HowWeWork