Stagflation With Powell Could Make Gold Price Happy / Commodities / Gold and Silver 2022
The upcoming stagflation might be lesssevere than in the 1970s. So is the Fed’s reaction, which could mean good newsfor gold.
There are many terrifying statements you can hear from another person. One example is: “Honey, we need to talk!” Another is: “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.” However, the scariest English word, especially nowadays, is “stagflation.” Brrr! I’ve explained it many times, but let me remind you that stagflation is a combination of economic stagnation and high inflation. This is why it’s a nightmare for central bankers as they should ease monetary policy to stimulate the economy and simultaneously tighten it to curb inflation. Although we haven’t fallen into recession yet, the pace of GDP growth has slowed down recently. According to the World Bank’s report Global Economic Prospects from June 2022, “the global economy is in the midst of a sharp growth slowdown” and “growth over the next decade is expected to be considerably weaker than over the past two decades.” The U.S. growth is expected to slow to 2.5 percent in 2022, 1.2 percentage points lower than previously projected and 3.2 percentage points below growth in 2021.
This is why more and more experts raise concerns about stagflation similar to whathappened in the 1970s. So far, employment remains strong, but the miseryindex, which is the sum of the unemploymentrate and inflation rate, is already relatively high (see the chartbelow) and could continue to rise if economic activity deteriorates further.
So, it seems that the consensus view isthat stagflation is likely, but thekey question is how bad it will be, or how similar it will be to thestagflation of the 1970s. As the chart below shows, that period was pretty bad.The inflation rate stayed above 5% for a decade, reaching almost 15% in early1980. Meanwhile, there was a long and deep recession in 1973-1975 and thesubsequent two in the 1980s, triggered by Volcker’smonetary tightening that was necessary to curb high inflation.
Similarities are quite obvious. First, the economic slowdown came after the previous recession and rebound. Second, supply shocks. Supply disruptions caused by the pandemic and by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine resemble the oil shocks of the 1970s. Third, the burst of inflation comes after prolonged period of easy monetary policy and negative real interest rates. According to the World Bank, “global real interest rates averaged -0.5 percent over both the 1970-1980 and the 2010-2021 periods”. Fourth, consumer inflation expectations are rising significantly, which increases the risk of their de-anchoring, as in the 1970s. As the chart below shows, consumers now expect inflation to run at 5.4% over the next twelve months, according to the University of Michigan survey, the highest level since 1981.
However, the World Bank also points out important differences. First, the magnitude of commodity price jumps has been smaller than in the 1970s. Oil prices are still below the peaks from those years, especially in real terms, while the economy is much more energy-dependent. Second, the fiscal stance is tighter now. In the 1970s, fiscal policy was very easy, while now it’s expected to tighten, which could help to curb inflation. According to the CBO, the federal budget deficit will shrink to $1.0 trillion in 2022 from $2.8 trillion last year.
Third, the M2 money stock M2 ballooned after the pandemic by 40% in just twoyears. So, the increase in the moneysupply was much more abrupt, although it was rather a one-timeoutburst than a constant fast pace of money supply growth as it was in the1970s (see the chart below). Thus, the pattern of inflation could be similar.
Fourth, contemporary economies are muchmore flexible with the weaker position of trade unions, and income and pricepolicies (like interest or price controls) are not popular today. It allows afaster response of supply to rising prices and reduces the likelihood ofprice-wage spirals. The fifth difference mentioned by the World Bank is morecredible monetary policy frameworks and better-anchored inflation expectations.Although true, I would be cautious here, as the Fed remains behind the curve and peoplecould quickly lose confidence in the central bank while inflation expectationscould easily de-anchor.
For me, the two crucial differences arethe much higher levels of both private and publicdebt today compared to the 1970s (see the chart below) and lesspolitical willingness to combat inflation. Yes, Powell could have a laser focuson addressing inflation right now, but Iseriously doubt whether he will stick with significantly raising interestrates, especially when the economy starts to falter.
So, what are the conclusions andimplications for the gold market? Well, stagflationis indeed likely, as I expect a further economic slowdown next year, whichwill be accompanied by stubbornly elevated inflation, although rather lowerthan this year, thanks to normalization in the pace of money supply growth andtightening of both monetary and fiscal policies. Hence, the upcomingstagflation could be less severe than in the 1970s.
The Fed’s response will also be less aggressive. Luckily for the yellow metal, Powell is not Volcker, so he won’t raise the federal funds rate so decisively. Hence, the current Fed’s tightening cycle could continue to exert downward pressure on gold. However, when the Fed chickens out and deviates from its hawkish plan when faced with recessionary winds, gold should rally again.
Thank you.
If you enjoyed the above analysis and would you like to knowmore about the gold ETFs and their impact on gold price, we invite you to readthe April MarketOverview report. If you're interested in the detailed price analysis andprice projections with targets, we invite you to sign up for our Gold & SilverTrading Alerts . If you're not ready to subscribe at this time, we inviteyou to sign up for our goldnewsletter and stay up-to-date with our latest free articles. It's freeand you can unsubscribe anytime.
Arkadiusz Sieron
Sunshine Profits‘ MarketOverview Editor
Disclaimer
All essays, research and information found aboverepresent analyses and opinions of Przemyslaw Radomski, CFA and SunshineProfits' associates only. As such, it may prove wrong and be a subject tochange without notice. Opinions and analyses were based on data available toauthors of respective essays at the time of writing. Although the informationprovided above is based on careful research and sources that are believed to beaccurate, Przemyslaw Radomski, CFA and his associates do not guarantee theaccuracy or thoroughness of the data or information reported. The opinionspublished above are neither an offer nor a recommendation to purchase or sell anysecurities. Mr. Radomski is not a Registered Securities Advisor. By readingPrzemyslaw Radomski's, CFA reports you fully agree that he will not be heldresponsible or liable for any decisions you make regarding any informationprovided in these reports. Investing, trading and speculation in any financialmarkets may involve high risk of loss. Przemyslaw Radomski, CFA, SunshineProfits' employees and affiliates as well as members of their families may havea short or long position in any securities, including those mentioned in any ofthe reports or essays, and may make additional purchases and/or sales of thosesecurities without notice.
Arkadiusz Sieron Archive |
© 2005-2019 http://www.MarketOracle.co.uk - The Market Oracle is a FREE Daily Financial Markets Analysis & Forecasting online publication.